Many industry participants think that they understand the regulatory nuances of an All-Or-None offering. Yeah, right. In the end, some AONs wind up a hopeless mess of a busted deal and follow-on regulatory sanctions.All of which recalls the lyrics of Pearl Jam's "All Or None":
It's a hopeless... situation
And I'm starting to believe
That this hopeless... situation
Is what I'm trying to achieve
Consider a recent FINRA regulatory settlement involving All-Or-None offerings. Maybe we can get Eddie Vedder to sing about it?
Case In
Point
For
the purpose of proposing a settlement of rule violations alleged by the
Financial Industry Regulatory Authority ("FINRA"), without admitting or denying
the findings, prior to a regulatory hearing, and without an adjudication of any
issue, Core Financial, LLC submitted a Letter of Acceptance, Waiver and Consent
("AWC"), which FINRA accepted. In the Matter of Core Financial, LLC, Respondent
(AWC # 2014039217201, June 4,
2015).
Since
2010, Core Financial, LLC has been a registered broker-dealer, which employs
six registered representatives at one branch office. Core Financial's primary
business is acting as a placement agent for private real estate syndications
structured as direct participation programs, also known in industry lingo as
DPPs. The AWC asserts that Core Financial had no prior relevant disciplinary
history.
AONs
The AWC
asserts that during the relevant period between November 2010 and February
2014, Core Financial acted as a placement agent for six contingent offerings of
securities issued by the firm's affiliated companies. These contingent
offerings were of the All Or None ("AON") variety.
Broker-dealers selling AONs must comply with SEC Rules 10b-9
and 15c2-4 [Ed: yellow highlighting
provided]:
§
240.10b-9 Prohibited representations in connection with certain
offerings.
(a) It shall constitute a manipulative or deception
device or contrivance, as used in section 10(b) of the Act, for any person,
directly or indirectly, in connection with the offer or sale of any security,
to make any representation:
(1) To the effect that the security is being offered
or sold on an "all-or-none" basis, unless the security is part of an offering
or distribution being made on the condition that all or a specified amount of
the consideration paid for such security will be promptly refunded to the
purchaser unless (i) all of the securities being offered are sold at a
specified price within a specified time, and (ii) the total amount due to the
seller is received by him by a specified date;
or
(2) To the effect that the security is being offered
or sold on any other basis whereby all or part of the consideration paid for
any such security will be refunded to the purchaser if all or some of the
securities are not sold, unless the security is part of an offering or
distribution being made on the condition that all or a specified part of the
consideration paid for such security will be promptly refunded to the purchaser
unless (i) a specified number of units of the security are sold at a specified
price within a specified time, and (ii) the total amount due to the seller is received
by him by a specified
date.
(b) This rule shall not apply to any offer or sale of
securities as to which the seller has a firm commitment from underwriters or
others (subject only to customary conditions precedent, including "market
outs") for the purchase of all the securities being
offered.
§
240.15c2-4 Transmission or maintenance of payments received in connection with
underwritings.
It shall constitute a "fraudulent, deceptive, or
manipulative act or practice" as used in section 15(c)(2) of the Act, for any broker,
dealer or municipal securities dealer participating in any distribution of
securities, other than a firm-commitment underwriting, to accept any part of
the sale price of any security being distributed
unless:
(a) The money or other consideration received is
promptly transmitted to the persons entitled thereto; or
(b) If the distribution is being made on an
"all-or-none" basis, or on any other basis which contemplates that payment is
not to be made to the person on whose behalf the distribution is being made
until some further event or contingency occurs, (1) the money or other consideration
received is promptly deposited in a separate bank account, as agent or trustee
for the persons who have the beneficial interests therein, until the
appropriate event or contingency has occurred, and then the funds are promptly
transmitted or returned to the persons entitled thereto, or (2) all such funds
are promptly transmitted to a bank which has agreed in writing to hold all such
funds in escrow for the persons who have the beneficial interests therein and
to transmit or return such funds directly to the persons entitled thereto when
the appropriate event or contingency has
occurred.
AON
Recap
Federal rules define an AON
offering as one based upon an offering/distribution conditioned on a threshold
requirement that:
all or a specified
amount of the consideration paid for such
security
will be promptly refunded to the purchaser
unless
the securities are
sold at a specified price within a specified time, and
the total amount
due to the seller is received by him by a specified
date.
Federal rules further provide
that payment is not to be made to the person on whose behalf the AON
distribution until the designated contingency occurs. In the interim, received
funds are to be promptly deposited in a:
separate bank
account, as agent or trustee for the persons who have the beneficial interests;
or
bank which has agreed in writing to hold all such
funds in escrow for the persons who have the beneficial
interests.
NOTE: So-called
"$5,000 Broker Dealers" -- those with a minimum $5,000 Net
Capital requirement pursuant to SEC Rule 15c3-1(a)(2)(vi) --
must resort to the bank escrow option (#2 above).
SIDE BAR: $5,000 Broker
Dealers are subject to certain restrictions on the extent of their
business and do not:
receive or hold funds or securities
for, or owe funds or securities to, customers; and
carry
accounts of or for customers (generally accounts are carried by
"clearing" firms for these "introducing"
firms).
Escr-Ow!
The AWC
alleges that during the relevant period between November 2010 and February
2014, Core Financial was "$5,000 broker-dealer" and should have transmitted
funds to a compliant bank escrow account
for each of the subject AONs. Contrary to its obligations, Core Financial
purportedly deposited investor funds into an escrow account for which the
escrow agent was not the bank but an individual who was both the firm's
attorney and the issuer's attorney, in
violation of SEC Rule 15c2-4 and FINRA Rule
2010.
(Aw)Fully
Paid
In connection with two of AONs, the
AWC asserts that although Core Financial sold all of the securities required to
be placed in bona fide transactions, the securities were not "fully paid
for" within the specified period in violation
of SEC Rule 10b-9 and FINRA Rule 2010. Allegedly,
Core Financially substituted its own funds for funds not yet
received from an investor. That substitution-payment apparently gave the firm
the false impression that it could close the two cited AONs and release
proceeds from the escrow and transmit to the issuer. In fact, the AWC deemed
the substitution as not constituting a timelyfull-payment by the
investor and, as such, the immediate termination of the offerings was required with the prompt return of
escrowed funds to the investors.
Sanctions
In accordance with the terms of the AWC,
FINRA imposed upon Core Financial a Censure and $17,500
fine.