Many popular songs contain a nugget of wisdom; however,
we often find ourselves humming the tune but forgetting the lyrics. On that
busy byway of Wall Street, the formidable warning of Joni Mitchell's classic
"Big Yellow Taxi" is regularly lost upon management. Oh sure, those
in the C-suites may remember something about a big yellow taxi or the paving
over of paradise, but it's that critical line about not knowing what you've got
till it's gone that they just don't quite recall. That's a shame because if you
ask former industry employees, you will frequently hear their refrain about how
they quit their job because they never felt appreciated -- and when that yellow
cab pulled up, they jumped in and gladly paid the fare and added a nice tip for
the ride to a new employer.
Case In
Point
In a Financial
Industry Regulatory Authority ("FINRA") Arbitration Statement of
Claim filed in May 2014, Claimant Wedbush Securities alleged breaches of and
aiding and abetting breaches of fiduciary duty and duty of loyalty; violation
of FINRA Rules of Conduct; and interference with prospective economic advantage.
Claimant Wedbush sought from former employee Respondent Whinery disgorgement
and return of all compensation, expense reimbursements, and benefits paid to
him during his employment with the firm. Additionally, Claimant sought interest
and punitive damages. At the hearing's close, Claimant sought $1,420,600.00 in
compensatory damages and $500,000 in exemplary damages. In the Matter
of the FINRA Arbitration Between Wedbush Securities Inc.,Claimant,
vs. Stifel, Nicolaus & Company, Incorporated and Gary
Robert Whinery, Respondent(FINRA
Arbitration 14-01676, May 12, 2016.
Respondents Whinery and Stifel, Nicolaus
& Co. generally denied the allegations and asserted various affirmative
defenses.
John Does I -
XX In filing its Claim, Wedbush apparently included in
the caption 20 Respondents John Doe. During the hearing, Claimant moved to dismiss those 20 fictitious respondents, which the FINRA Arbitration Panel granted without opposition from Respondents Stifel and Whinery.
SIDE BAR: 20
Respondents John Doe; twenty strikes me as a nice round number. As best I can
tell from the relatively sparse fact pattern provided in the FINRA Arbitration
Decision, what we got going on here is a likely
garden-variety post-employment dispute in which the former employer is pissed
off at former employee Whinery and the former employee's new employer Stifel
Nicolaus. Hey, you know, it happens on Wall Street -- everyday lots of folks
get pissed off at lots of other folks. Welcome to the biz.
Using all my powers of
inference, I'm guessing that this arbitration sort of reflects some remorse by
Claimant Wedbush about the departure of its former employee Whinery and
a suspicion by Claimant that Whinery's new employer Stifel Nicolaus and a cast
of at least 20 unidentified folks conspired to improperly entice, lure, or
otherwise attract Whinery away from the confines of his former job. Frankly, if
it took 20-plus folks and/or entities to pry Whinery away from Wedbush, the
former employee likely agonized about the stay-or-go thing.
Panel
Award The FINRA
Arbitration Panel denied Claimant Wedbush's claims and found the firm liable to
Respondents for $9,998.16 in costs with 5% interest accruing 30 days from the
service of the Award until paid in full. Of the $12,000 in hearing session
fees, the Panel assessed $11,500 against Claimant Wedbush and the balance
against Respondents jointly and severally.Bill Singer's
Comment Ouch! That must have
smarted. Can't be a lot of happy faces at Wedbush after this
verdict. In my opinion, when you sue a former employee and his new
firm for nearly $2 million in damages and a FINRA Arbitration Panel dismisses
your claims and awards that former employee and his new firm
just shy of $10,000 plus interest in costs and you're
charged with about 96% of the arbitration hearing session fees, you haven't
just lost your case but you've emerged somewhat
humiliated.The lesson for
Webush and for all Wall Street employers is that maintaining valued employees
is not something that you accomplish through neglect or indifference. Quite
often the time and money you spend in trying to get some measure of revenge
post-employment would have been better spent during the employment in a
meaningful effort to communicate with the employee and determine what would
keep that individual happy, content, and in your employ. By the time that big
yellow taxi pulls up outside your offices and takes away Mr. Whinery, it's too
late. And if you only figure out after
the cab has pulled away from the curb how valued an employee it was that you
allowed to leave, well, you know, whose fault is
that?