The SEC Says Sponsored Research Didn't Disclose It Was Paid For

July 1, 2021

Sponsored research. An interesting idea. Your public company can't attract research. Could be you're a hidden gem that no one's found. Could be that you're a hot, wet, steamy mess that no one wants to bother with. Lots of possibilities. One solution is that you pay someone to write about your business. For some struggling companies, that may be the only way to kick-start interest in their stock. For other companies, well, how should I put it -- maybe it's a way to generate a little bit of pump and whole lot of dump. All depends on who's paying and who's getting paid. Be that as it may, a recent SEC regulatory settlement sheds some light on sponsored research. 

Sponsored Research

Reuben Robert Goldman, 52, is the founder/owner/sole employee of Two Triangle Consulting Group, LLC d/b/a Goldman Small Cap Research ("GSCR"); and between 1989 and 2003, Goldman held Series 7, 62, 62, and 65 licenses while registered with several broker dealers. That's a helluva a lot of hats for one guy to wear and Mr. Goldman likely doffs them with great pride and wears them with aplomb. As to the nature of GSCR's business, well, it apparently distributes stock market research and promotional research through "GoldmanResearch.com," email lists, and the company's Twitter and Facebook accounts. So what could go wrong with all of that right?

SEC Settlement

Without admitting or denying the findings in an SEC Order, Respondents consented to the entry of an SEC Order In the Matter of Reuben Robert Goldman and Two Triangle Consulting Group, LLC d/b/a Goldman Small Cap Research, Respondents (SEC Order Instituting Cease-and-Desist Proceedings, Making Findings, and Imposing Order, '33 Act Rel. No. 10953, Admin. Proc. File No. 3-320379 / June 30, 2021)
https://www.sec.gov/litigation/admin/2021/33-10953.pdf As alleged in part in the SEC Order:

3. GSCR's business primarily consists of producing promotional materials about microcap issuers and distributing these materials online to potential investors in exchange for cash payments from the issuers or third parties. Since GSCR's inception, Goldman has drafted nearly all of GSCR's publications, and he has personally drafted and publicly posted all of GSCR's tweets. 

4. Between April 28, 2016 and March 2, 2021, Goldman used GSCR's Twitter account (@GoldmanSmallCap) to publish twenty-nine sponsored promotional tweets that failed to disclose that GSCR had been compensated by the issuers to promote their securities. Specifically, these twenty-nine tweets promoted the securities of issuers that had paid GSCR for promotional services, but did not disclose that they were paid promotions or identify the amount of GSCR's compensation. 

5. Each of the twenty-nine tweets included positive messages about the issuer's business or commentary on the potential value of the issuer's securities. In each of the tweets, Goldman included a "cashtag" -- the issuer's ticker symbol preceded by a dollar sign ("$"). 

6. As a result of the conduct described above, Respondents violated Section 17(b) of the Securities Act, which prohibits publishing, giving publicity to, or circulating "any notice, circular, advertisement . . . or communication which, though not purporting to offer a security for sale, describes such security for a consideration received or to be received, directly or indirectly, from an issuer . . . without fully disclosing the receipt, whether past or prospective, of such consideration and the amount thereof." 

In accordance with the terms of the settlement and SEC Order, Respondents will cease and desist from committing or causing violations of Section 17(b) of the Securities Act and will jointly and severally disgorge $39,931 plus $3,720.82 interest, and will jointly and severally pay a $39,931 civil money penalty. Additionally, Respondents agreed to an undertaking whereby they will:

conduct a comprehensive review of the disclosure practices of all entities they directly or indirectly own or control, and implement policies and procedures regarding compliance with Section 17(b) of the Securities Act, including with that Section's requirements concerning disclosure of both the receipt of consideration and the amount thereof. 

Certify, in writing, compliance with the undertaking set forth above . . .

Bill Singer's Comment

According to the SEC Order, GSCR's business primarily consists of producing promotional materials about microcap issuers and distributing these materials online to potential investors in exchange for cash payments from the issuers or third parties." That's a nice business plan. If you visit the GoldmanResearch.com website, you will come across this disclaimer, which states in part at "Sponsored Research : Definition and Explanation
https://www.goldmanresearch.com/201002021219/Article/sponsored-research-definition-and-explanation.html

Unless otherwise noted, investors should view all of our reports, updates, notes, alerts and podcast interviews as sponsored content, or sponsored research.  What does this mean?

It means that the content we produce is paid for by the issuers or a third party. Although we are paid to publish and distribute the content, we do not take on any assignment unless we believe that a particular company or stock has merit; i.e., has meaningful upside potential that outweighs the risk.  Given the risk profile of many of the companies we have covered or written about, the underlying stocks' risk/reward is akin to venture capital which has a low success rate (batting average) but when there is a winner it can move higher in value exponentially. Therefore, in the case of any stock we write about or engage in an interview, we believe it has the potential to generate outsized returns despite its inherent, above-average business, market, or financial risk.

Why Sponsored Research?

The reasons behind companies' seeking our coverage vary.  In most cases, the firms on which we publish reports cannot attract traditional research coverage by investment banks and broker-dealers. They may wish to add to their shareholder base and overall value because they are contemplating future up-listings or are perhaps seeking to use an opportunity such as greater awareness and visibility as an opportunity to raise funds for acquisitions or working capital. In nearly all cases, we find that while management teams know their industry and can speak to their partner or customer audiences, they have difficulty presenting their company to prospective investors. This is one of our strengths, as we attempt to succinctly describe the underlying companies, their industries, where they fit in the food chain, etc. Moreover, we deem it important for the research to be presented in the proper format.

Without such reports or interviews, it is likely that the stock would languish and speculative investors would not have an opportunity to learn or potentially invest in such a company.  However, given the companies' risk profile, we endeavor to list what would be considered leading risks in the risk factors sections found in our coverage initiation reports. . . .

Sponsored research. Strikes me as a euphemism. If we go by Goldman Research's narrative, without sponsored research "it is likely that the stock would languish . . ." Okay, sure, that's one way of putting it. Pay for play might be another way.  A counterfactual would be that there may be reasons why certain firms cannot attract traditional research coverage by investment banks and broker-dealers; e.g. a lousy balance sheet, non-existent profits, horrific business plan, etc. 

It's virtually impossible to conduct an online search for anything without finding that the products/services "results" atop the list are paid and sponsored. And, yes, those top-of-the-list results often disclose that they are ads or sponsored content. Similarly, so much of what is presented online as "free" is interrupted by an unwanted and intrusive video advertisement. So . . . sponsored research is a concept that's found a home in this Internet Age. That doesn't make the concept of sponsored research palatable. It just puts things in perspective. Unfortunately, part of that perspective is reconciling Goldman Small Cap Research's online disclaimers with this finding in the SEC Order:

4. Between April 28, 2016 and March 2, 2021, Goldman used GSCR's Twitter account (@GoldmanSmallCap) to publish twenty-nine sponsored promotional tweets that failed to disclose that GSCR had been compensated by the issuers to promote their securities. Specifically, these twenty-nine tweets promoted the securities of issuers that had paid GSCR for promotional services, but did not disclose that they were paid promotions or identify the amount of GSCR's compensation. 

I don't like this settlement. I don't think it addresses the troubling issues raised by sponsored research. I am worried that the takeaway from the SEC's imposition of a cease-and-desist and relatively modest financial sanctions is that the business model of paid research is somehow okay. Then again, I don't like the Nanny State and until such time as Congress outlaws sponsored research, well, I guess it's one of those things that is perfectly legal but just something that I don't like.