November 2022: Goldman General Counsel Kathryn Ruemmler Defends CEO Solomon
Goldman Sachs. Harassed. Sexual Assault. Misogyny. David Solomon. Oral Sex. Sexism. Mistreatment of Women. Sexist Culture. Troubling Behavior. SEC Charges. Not exactly the stuff a publicist dreams about. Understandably, there was pushback from the firm. Following Bloomberg News' November 15th story about Goldman Sachs' Chief Executive Officer David Solomon and a $12 million settlement with a former Goldman Partner, we have, in part, this:
The head of Wall Street’s most prestigious investment bank bragged to the underlings that he was the only one among the group to have received oral sex the previous night, according to a complaint revealed Tuesday by Bloomberg News.
. . .
The alleged remark by Solomon was not the central focus of the lawsuit, which claimed Goldman paid women less than men for doing the same jobs and that the company tolerated crude and vulgar remarks from senior officials.
. . .
"Bloomberg’s reporting contains factual errors, and we dispute this story," said Kathy Ruemmler, General Counsel at Goldman. "Anyone who works with David knows his respect for women, and his long record of creating an inclusive and supportive environment for women."
Ruemmler's Dual Role (Inescapable Conflicts)
Kathryn Ruemmler has nothing whatsoever to apologize for in terms of where she's worked, who she's represented, what she has said in discharging her obligation as a zealous advocate, or in accepting the nomination to FINRA's Board. To answer the unasked question: No, I don't know her and have never met or even spoken to her.
In January 2021, the FINRA Board of Governors appointed Kathryn Ruemmler to fill the Floor Member Governor's seat. There was no election. Ruemmler was hand picked, and her appointment was approved by the full Board. The Governors who voted to approve Ruemmler's nomination knew or should have known of the troubling allegations set out in the pending 2010 Class Action against Goldman Sachs; and, as such, should have made a full inquiry of Ruemmler as to her likely role, going forward, on behalf of her employer.
When Goldman Sachs General Counsel Ruemmler asserts that Goldman Sachs CEO Solomon has "respect for women" and a "long record of creating an inclusive and supportive environment for women," her comments are raised to refute claims to the contrary. In defending her firm and its senior management, by inference (if not in actuality) Ruemmler questions the veracity of the women whose allegations provide the underpinnings of the Class Action Complaint. Either Goldman Sachs was/is a sexist employer, and the various female Plaintiffs have made valid claims; or, Goldman Sachs was not/is not a sexist employer, and the Plaintiffs have made invalid claims. Accordingly, we know where General Counsel Ruemmler stands on the Class Action Plaintiffs' allegations; but where does FINRA Governor Ruemmler stand on the allegations -- and where does FINRA's Board of Governors stand on the allegations?
The FINRA Regulatory Policy Committee members (of which Ruemmler is one) serve as the FINRA Regulation, Inc. Board of Directors -- that's no small dual role because that involves the "primary day-to-day responsibility for the regulation, surveillance, examination and disciplining of member firms and registered persons, with respect to market activities as well as other self-regulatory matters." Notwithstanding that daily regulatory responsibility, FINRA Governor/FINRA Regulatory Policy Committeeperson/Goldman Sachs General Counsel Kathryn Ruemmler disapproved efforts by the United States Department of Justice to appoint more independent monitors after criminal settlements: "Goldman Sachs Legal Chief Knocks Biden DOJ on White Collar Shift" (Bloomberg Law / March 4, 2022) https://news.bloomberglaw.com/us-law-week/goldman-sachs-legal-chief-knocks-biden-doj-on-white-collar-shift, where she is quoted, in part, as saying:
"I have long been of the view that monitors should really be reserved for the quite unusual case, that they should not be the norm, that they should be only required in very very rare circumstances," said Ruemmler, who served as White House counsel to former President Barack Obama.
DOJ is "at its best when it’s investigating and prosecuting crimes," added Ruemmler, who was also principal associate deputy attorney general under Obama. "That’s what they should be doing. And when you start getting into monitors, the department starts to feel and I think look a bit more like a regulator."
Which begs the question as to whether FINRA-the-regulator agrees with Ruemmler's press comments about how the United States Department of Justice should confine itself to "investigating and prosecuting crimes," because once DOJ starts "getting into monitors, the department starts to feel and I think look a bit more like a regulator." Maybe FINRA is now enamored with the idea that as a regulator it should do more monitoring and less of that investigating and prosecuting stuff? I am unaware of any published comment by FINRA refuting Governor Ruemmler's position. Speaking of possibilities, perhaps the FINRA Regulatory Policy Committee might one day prod the self-regulatory-organization into prosecuting racism and sexism in the industry? Then again, one can imagine the awkwardness that such newfound zeal might impose upon Goldman Sachs General Counsel / FINRA Governor Ruemmler during the pendency of the sexism Class Action. All of which could motivate FINRA to tone down all that diversity and inclusion talk.
Inescapably, Ruemmler speaks out of both sides of her mouth as an industry General Counsel and as a FINRA Governor. Which places FINRA in an uncomfortable position when Ruemmler publicly opposes DOJ's expanded use of independent monitors for criminal settlements, some of which would likely involve Wall Street fraudsters. Similarly, Ruemmler's defense of her firm and its senior management against allegations of sexist misconduct may have a chilling effect on those questioning the diversity of FINRA's member firms and seeking to enroll the self-regulatory-organization in the fight against many forms of discrimination and harassment. Further, Ruemmler's involvement with the ongoing defense of Goldman against the Class Action may foster unease among other Board members and FINRA staff -- and that discomfort may manifest itself in not raising issues that should be raised.
The Thought Process (Or Lack Of One) At FINRA
In January 2021, were FINRA's Governors unaware of the decade-old Class Action alleging sexism at Goldman Sachs and the lurid stories emerging from other former female executives?
In January 2021, what was FINRA's Board of Governors thinking (or not) when it appointed Goldman Sachs' General Counsel to the Board and further seated her on two of FINRA's more important Committees -- at that moment in time, why did FINRA's Board of Governors appoint any Goldman Sachs General Counsel to serve on the Board?
Goldman Sachs pays its General Counsel Ruemmler a reported $17.5 million per annum to handle its legal affairs; and she's going to have spare time to serve as a FINRA Governor and also as a member of two FINRA Committees -- and all this while juggling her oversight of her firm's defense against the Class Action and voicing her opinions about incursions by DOJ/SEC/CFTC into Goldman's affairs?
It is now about two weeks since the negative November 15, 2022, press reports about the undisclosed $12 million settlement by Goldman with a former female partner and the attendant salacious allegations. I waited . . . I hoped for some response from the women on FINRA's Board. Some expressions of concern. Perhaps even a modicum of outrage. Despite the gravity of the disclosure by the press of allegations of sexual harassment/discrimination at Goldman Sachs, there is no evidence that any FINRA Governor has called for Governor Ruemmler's resignation or asked the Board to consider an appropriate response. Moreover, on November 22, 2022, Goldman Sachs Asset Management, L.P. agreed to pay a $4 million penalty pursuant to the settlement of SEC charges that it had failed to establish reasonable policies and procedures governing how it evaluated Environmental, Social, and Governance ("ESG") investments at two mutual funds and a separately managed account. "SEC Charges Goldman Sachs Asset Management for Failing to Follow its Policies and Procedures Involving ESG Investments" (SEC Release / November 22, 2022)https://www.sec.gov/news/press-release/2022-209
I look at the composition of FINRA's Board and see many women and minorities. I look at the composition of the two FINRA Committees on which Ruemmler sits and I see diversity. All of which troubles me and it should trouble you too. There is no published report about any FINRA Governor having challenged the 2021 appointment of Goldman Sachs' General Counsel to the Board of Governors of Wall Street's leading self-regulatory-organization: at a time when Goldman Sachs was embroiled in a Class Action alleging sexism. Similarly, there was no published report in 2022 that any FINRA Governor had requested the resignation of Governor Ruemmler. It is now nearly 2023. The Governors' silence is deafening. As the poet Ella Wheeler Wilcox admonished "To sin by silence, when we should protest, Makes cowards out of men." In an updated, non-sexist revision of Wilcox's words, silence makes cowards out of men and women.
On June 11, 2020, some six months before Goldman Sachs General Counsel Ruemmler was appointed to FINRA's Board, FINRA's Board of Governors issued this statement
https://www.finra.org/about/governance/finra-board-governors/statement-bog-from-june-11-2020#:~:text=FINRA's%20mission%20is%20investor%20protection%20and%20market
%20integrity.&text=We%20are%20committed%20to%20continuing,the%20FINRA%20Board
%20of%20Governors:
We are grieved by the senseless death of George Floyd and other recent acts of violence against members of the Black and African American communities. We stand together with the FINRA community in our personal commitment to the principle of equal justice under the law and to fight all forms of racism and prejudice.
FINRA’s mission is investor protection and market integrity. We support management's determination to further enhance FINRA’s long-standing initiatives to pursue that mission with a diverse and inclusive workforce that represents all of society, and to expand our efforts to promote the financial literacy and capability of minority communities in collaboration with the FINRA Foundation. We are committed to continuing to increase the diversity of the FINRA Board of Governors. As a leader in the financial services industry, we also support management's determination to work collaboratively with others to promote greater diversity and inclusion across the industry, so that the industry can better engage traditionally underinvested communities and better represent and serve the needs of all investors.
And yet, six months after issuing the above June 2020 Statement, FINRA's Board appoints a General Counsel from a major member firm that is embroiled in a high-profile, tawdry Class Action alleging civil and human rights violations with an emphasis on a culture of sexism. Yes, those are all allegations. Yes, Goldman Sachs has every right to defend against the allegations and may well prevail. No . . . FINRA did not advance its purported commitment to "greater diversity and inclusion" on Wall Street by hand-picking Goldman Sachs' General Counsel to a sit on its Board on January 2021. A bad choice at a bad time.
None of this is about Ruemmler personally. All of this is about Goldman Sachs and the appropriateness of having that firm's General Counsel sitting on FINRA's Board at this moment in time with the pending Class Action and the swirl of troubling allegations. Again, this blog is not a personal attack against FINRA Governor Ruemmler; but it is an attack against FINRA and its lackluster Board of Governors. The investing public deserves better. The industry deserves better. What we need is advocacy and transparency. We need accountability. We need FINRA to act more like a regulator and less like some trade group on steroids. The corrosive influence of Wall Street politics eats away at the industry's regulators. This appears to be yet another instance. January 2021 was the wrong time for FINRA to appoint any Goldman Sachs General Counsel to its Board. During 2022, it was still a misguided appointment in need of rectification. In 2023, the concerns will only amplify.